Penthouse Development
Document Archive
Document Archive - 2001 to 2025
On this page we’ve collected together as much documentation, information and detail as we can and as we get it from the Developer.
Full details of how to stay up to date with everything, and how to contact CVRL, the Developers and other interested parties such as our MP and Building Control can be found in the “Staying in Touch Page” here.
It is important to remember that the lease to the roof spaces was sold to the Developer in 1997 and that our legal challenges to this sale ended in 2018. Although the Developer has the right to build on our roofs, we also have the right to protect the lives and property of Chiswick Village shareholders and leaseholders. It must also be remembered that when the penthouses are eventually sold, the owners of each penthouse will pay a Service Charge contribution, yet to be calculated by CVRL, and that CVRL will be responsible for the penthouses as part of the fabric of the whole of Chiswick Village.
The Developers frequently refer to blocks by number.
For clarity, the following is a simple guide translating relating block number to the flats they contain
Block 1 - Flats 1 to 16 Block 2 - Flats 17 to 36 Block 3 - Flats 37 to 56 Block 4 - Flats 57 - 76
Block 5 - Flats 77 to 100 Block 6 - Flats 101 to 118 Block 7 - Flats 119 to 142 Block 8 - Flats 143 - 160
Block 9 - Flats 161 to 184 Block 10 - Flats 185 to 204 Block 11 - Flats 205 to 220 Block 12 - Flats 221 - 236
Block 13 - Flats 237 to 252 Block 14 - Flats 253 to 268 Block 15 - Flats 269 to 280
Wednesday, 8th July 2026 - CVRL Penthouse Progress Meeting
The Penthouse development is now well established, and to their credit, the Developers have been organising fairly regular meetings to provide shareholders, leaseholders and residents with updates on progress.
It’s been some time, however, since CVRL has run similar meetings to provide everyone with a similar update on how negotiations with the Developers are progressing. In order to remedy that, we’ll be arranging CVRL Penthouse Progress Meetings with residents and leaseholders in the week prior to the update meetings hosted by the Developers.
Full details of this first of the regular meetings are provided here, with the meeting notice available here.
Monday, 6th July 2026 - Progress on Lifts and Demand for an EGM
The letter attached here provides details of the work planned to bring the lifts into compliance with recent changes to Health and Safety law, as well as the most recent update on the recent demand for an EGM on the Board’s plans for the lifts.
Thursday, 2nd July 2026 - Progress Meeting 5
Attached here are the most recent progress report on the penthouse Development and the most up to date progress plan provided by the Developers.
With regard to the future of the lifts, we would like to draw your attention to paragraphs 19 and 20, and especially paragraph 21 of the progress report. In particular, paragraph 21 states that
CVRL and the leaseholders are all aware of the need in the short term for the necessary refurbishment of the lifts under the 10-year plan that has been described to Leaseholders in recent communications: https://cvrl.tiny.us/2026-02-23-Lifts-Letter
Adam G for CVRL explained that the developers have selected PIP Lifts as their chosen vendor to deliver extension of the lifts to the new top floor. The cost information provided by the Developers is, in the opinion of CVRL’s appointed lift consultant, Stewart Proctor, lacking detail. The Developers, London Penthouse, explained that it is very difficult to provide a detailed cost breakdown for refurbishing the existing lifts. Instead, the Developers provided only a summary quotation for each lift. This quotation id not contain sufficient detail to allow CVRL to split out those items required as part of the CVRLs refurbishment from other works needed solely to extend the lifts to the new top floor.
Adam G. for CVRL then added that the information that was provided by the Developers was “wholly inadequate for inclusion in a Section 20 Notice required for CVRL to commission such work, so that CVRL cannot conduct the necessary leaseholder consultation needed to approve the funding of this work by CVRL.
The failure by the Developers to provide the necessary costing information that could have led to a joint programme of work means that Leaseholders will miss out on a substantial cost contribution from London Penthouse. This also means that each lift will be out of action during the penthouse development for a period of approximately eight weeks, and then at some future date, for a further period of approximately eight weeks while the existing lift components modernisation works that CVRL must deliver, are carried out separately.
The overall result of this failure to provide detailed costs for this work is that both CVRL and the Developers will lose a significant opportunity for cost, disruption and time and effort savings.
Monday, 8th June 2026 - Hollis Global Site Visit Report
Attached here is the latest Site Visit report from Hollis Global, one of our specialist partners.
James Safapour, the Hollis Global associate who completed the report, also offered the following commentary.
The current construction is of an above average in quality, and the elements witnessed have all been approached in line with regulations and current industry standards.
I can comfortably state, that all observed work steams and build elements are exactly what I would expect to observe. And the quality is very good. On inspecting the SFS structures, I did not witness a single issue with the installation, with the same being said of the facade treatments. Both the slip brick carrier systems and the rain screen cladding are to manufacturers recommendations and again align with industry standards.
Where able to observe the build ups were as required, with carrier boards appropriately fixed, EPDM applied, carrier systems correctly spaced, cavity barriers all installed and without concern.
Internally blocks 5 - 9 are all in varying stages of progress, which enabled me to get a reasonable idea as to the build quality throughout. With drylining ( including use of WEDI boards in wet areas), plastering, MEP installations, joinery , etc all in progress. I would like to highlight that the MEP installations were of a very good standard. Although early days, you can tell that coordination has been thought about, and I will be surprised if there are any issues relation to proximity of fire detection and ventilation.
I also checked roof works and so far, so good - obviously there is plant still to be installed and a man-safe system, but the detailing all appears correct.
There were a few minor observations in relation the build:
Block 7 - there was a structural steel installed fixed to the existing fabric; however, I would expect this to be back filled to offer a solid bearing . This was raised to the site team.
Block 5 and all others - the fire compartment lines between the new stair cores and residential areas , both above ceilings and below floors are still to be done. This was raised to the site team.
Walking externally there were building materials found in the grassed and planted areas, including fixings, swarf, off cuts, etc. This was raised to the site team and suggested bi-weekly cleaning.
Where new pipe works are penetrating the existing copings - these all need to be made good at completion. This was raised to the site team.
The most concerning, but not related to the construction elements, were a few H&S issues:
Proper access needs to be arranged to access buildings, over the existing coping. Current method is not suitable, so steps or ramps, with handrails either side are required.
Trailing leads - these were everywhere and a management plan needs to be put into place.
General housekeeping - site including site compound could benefit from better housekeeping to remove dirt, debris and materials.
Therefore, all in all, the construction quality is very good, however, improvements to housekeeping is needed.
Whilst on site there was a resident complaint, whereby it was suggested that protective foam could be installed. I agree, and although scaffolding works were in progress, the contractor could be approached and this carried out at the soonest available opportunity.
There was also concern from the site FM team , in relation to access plant rooms, out of hours and the safe access. Although access is required at all times, we need to be mindful that technically, plantrooms are now in the contractor's demise. Therefore, I would suggest that a conversation be had, and the agreement in place, should access be required, outside of work hours that a contractor representitive is available to assist and offer safe access through site. Non- construction access should not occur at all."
Tuesday, 25th May 2026 - Next Open Meeting Announced
Attached here is the announcement of the next open meeting with London Penthouses.
18:00 - Wednesday July 1st 2026 - The Scout Hall, Oxford Road North, London W4 4DH
Tuesday, 9th May 2026 - Progress Report - 4
Attached here is the most recent progress report from the Developers
The updated Programme Summary is also available here
Tuesday, April 14th, 2026 - Progress Meeting - 3
Below are the progress notes provided by the Developers in April 2026.
Thursday, February 19th, 2026 - Build Progress Meeting
Below are the progress notes provided by the Developers in February 2026.
Tuesday, February 17th, 2026 - Updated Scaffolding Plan - Phase 1
Attached below is the most up to date version of the Scaffolding Plan provided by Penthouse Developments
Thursday, January 15th, 2026 - Minutes of the Build Progress Meeting - 8th January 2026
Below are the notes provided by Hayden Murton of Solo Estates 2007. They reflect the detailed discussions that took place at the first Progress Meeting. Where decisions are made the reasons behind such decisions will be made clear by the Board.
January 2026 - Full Response from Andy Slaughter - MP for Hammersmith and Chiswick
Martin Weaver, on behalf of CVRL wrote to Andy Slaughter MP in 2025, reauesting his views on the Penthouse Development. A summary of Mr. Slaughter’s email response can be found in the Penthouses Latest News page, however the following documents contain the full response from Andy Slaughter, as well as the associated documents provided by the developers, attached to his reply.
December 2025 - Complaint to the Health and Safety Executive
In November, 2025, Martin Weaver and others raised complaints with the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in respect of the safety or otherwise of the working arrangements in place in respect of the Penthouse development. The following documents both the initial complaint by Martin Weaver, and the response subsequently received from the HSE.
The complaint, as recorded by the HSE under case number CAT-0305895 is as follows:
Business or Organisation Name - London Penthouses
Issue location - Chiswick Village, London, W4 3BY
Location Description - Chiswick Village is a 1930s development of 280 flats and penthouse flats are in the process of being built on the roof.
Your Issue
Chiswick Village is a development of 280 individual flats across 15 blocks, which vary is height from four to six storeys. It was built in the late 1920's and in 2018 the air space was sold to a development company wanting to create 15 penthouse apartments on top of the 15 blocks. I am a resident at Chiswick Village, being a freeholder of a flat.
In September this year, London Penthouses commenced work for this development, erecting scaffolding to the six storey blocks (all five of them). Since this work began, the developer has not shared the details of for the development and we are in possession of surveys that highlight significant structural issues that will need attending to. The developer is not responding to any of our queries and as a consequence we have approached the Building Safety Regulator, London Borough Council and the London Fire Brigade for advice. The advice we have been given is to contact the Health and Safety Executive - and to report all of our concerns.
The first issue is that the scaffolding being erected, does not match the plans set out by London Penthouses in their design phase. Further, the material for the scaffolding is being left within public access outside of working hours, that some materials are being leaned up against resident property, blocking windows that could be the only escape route in the event of fire, that poles are being left precariously on top of the roofs of the flats. There is a further concern that the workmen erecting and climbing the scaffolding are not routinely or consistently wearing hard hats. I attach a pictures showing the material left in open access to the public; (image 1, image 4 and image 5) materials blocking resident windows, and workmen on scaffolding without hats.
The workman have left the doors open to the work they are doing to the top of the roof, allowing one resident to access the roof and take some photos - see below. This attachment also highlights damage to the internal corridors and that the workmen are using our lifts to transport heavy building materials - which they were not built for.
Despite the new Building Safety Regulations being established to prevent unsafe building work to residential flats, we appear to be caught in a regulatory loop - that the BSR cannot get involved until the buildings become high risk buildings (when they become seven storeys high) so referring back to Hounslow Borough Council, and Hounslow referring to the information given by the private building controller, SWECCO, being used by London Penthouses. Sadly, residents are feeling increasingly unsafe in their homes and we are now reaching out to you on the advice of Hounslow, who have indicated their view that there are significant shortfalls in the current plans shared by London Penthouses and definite breaches in health and safety.
Date submitted - November 12th, 2025
On December 2nd, 2025, the HSE, having completed their investigation, provided the following reply:
Dear Martin Weaver,
Thank you for contacting the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).
You recently contacted the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) describing concerns about standards of health and safety.
I can confirm that HSE has contacted the organisation carrying out the work to establish the current arrangements, and any additional control measures planned in relation to the areas of concern you raised.
Having comprehensively reviewed the information provided by them, and referencing HSE guidance as a benchmark for good practice, we are satisfied they understand their responsibilities, and are managing risk in a proportionate manner.
Additionally, your concern has been retained on HSE’s record for the organisation and will be used as information during any future interaction with them.
Thank you for bringing your concerns to HSE’s attention.
Yours sincerely.
Operational Services Division, Health & Safety Executive, Redgrave Court, Merton Road, Bootle, L20 7HS
December 2025 - Hollis Global Report on Party Wall Agreements and Access to CVRL Land
We have now received a review of the impact of the Party Wall etc Act 1996 and the Access to Neighbouring Land Act 1992, completed by Hollis Global who make part of the consultancy team working in behalf of CVRL.
Their report can be found here.
It’s an exhaustive review of the impact of these two items of legislation, however it canbe summrised most easily by quoting their conclusions as follows:
We conclude that the works proposed at each of the blocks does not trigger any of the provisions of the Party Wall etc Act 1996 or the Access to Neighbouring Land Act 1992. Accordingly, the statutory regimes set out in these to statutes will not provide any significant assistance to CVRL in stopping or mitigating works proposed and the need for access agreements has been neutralised by the terms of the development agreement/roof-top lease.
There will inevitably be a loss of visual and occupation amenity to various degrees and at various times to all residents of Chiswick Village resulting from the phases of the works proposed. Elevated levels of dirt, dust, noise and vibration will be also apparent from time to time and to varying degrees. The temporary loss of amenity will be difficult to abate unless the development agreement between CVRL and the developer sets out specific mitigation measures to limit the intrusive nature of the works.
December 2025 - PI Consulting Cold Water Services Review
We have now received the following report from PI Consulting, part of our consultancy and advisory team, following their review of the work done on existing cold water services
December 2025 - Design Pack
The following documents, in one case, dated October 2024, were received by us from the Developers on November 25th, 2025.
December 2025 - Structural Design Calculations
The following document was received by us recently from the Developers.
November 2025 - “Developer Works Update and Programme”
The following documents are referenced as part of the email discussion “Developer Works Update and Programme” located here - in the Latest News page.
September 2025 - Pi Consulting Report
Pi Consult, an engineering consultancy practice, was engaged by CVRL to review the documentation and drawings provided to CVRL to date, which have been completed by the various mechanical and electrical engineers employed by the developers.
Delivered in September 2025, a link to Pi Consult’s full report has been provided below. While we encourage all readers to read the entire report, some key statements stand out.
Roof Development Document Review Report – Page 3 - Summary and Findings
"Overall, the provided documentation is only completed up to concept stage with generic schematics and limited details that will not allow the successful installation of the MEP services and leaves so many gaps that Chiswick Village will not know what has been installed until the project is completed."
"Due to the lack of detailed design and the many associated gaps within the documentation which would prevent the current proposed scheme from achieving Building Regulations compliance, we have been unable to fully review the MEP documentation to a satisfactory level to allow us to advise our Chiswick Village client to proceed based on the current package."
"Currently this set of works together with the mechanical smoke ventilation systems are not included within the developer’s package. The costs of introducing these systems into the 15 blocks, together with backup Electrical supplies (typically being provided by generators) is cost prohibitive in our considered opinion to the Chiswick Village estate."
Pi Consult’s full report can be read here.
2025 - Continued
Sept 2025 - Penthouse Meeting - October 1st, 2025
Sept 2025 - London Penthouse Plans
Please note, the above link leads to a site owned and operated by the Developers, over which CVRL has no control
Sept 2025 - Developers Liability Insurance
Sept 2025 - Indicative Project Plan
Sept 2025 - Letter - Response to Developer Actions
Sept 2025 - Construction Management Plans
Sept 2025 - Lease - Roof Space Flats 1-16
Sept 2025 - Scaffold Plans - Blocks 4 to 6
Sept 2025 - Scaffold Plans - Block 7
Sept 2025 - Scaffold Plans - Blocks 8 to 11
2024
April 2024 - CVRL Newsletter 28
2023
May 19th, 2023 – Letter from Michael Richards & Co: Works for Penthouses
February 2023 - CVRL Newsletter 25
2019
October 2019 - CVRL Newsletter 23
2nd May 2019 – CVRL Letter to leaseholders re: upgrade to flat front doors
All further documents including leaseholder and resident consultation papers can be found here
1st March 2019 – CVRL Letter to leaseholders
2018
13th August 2018 - Annual General Meeting Papers
10th August 2018 - Agreement between CVRL and Spot Developments
2016
15th August 2016 - Annual General Meeting: Letter - 2016
Subsequent Annual Meetings are documented here
June 2016 - CVRL Newsletter 22
March 2016 - CVRL Newsletter 21
2013
10th October 2013 – CVRL – Letter of objection
7th October 2013 – CVRL – Notes of an open meeting held by CVRL
6th September 2013 – CVRL – Notice of Planning Application
25th July - 2013 - Matthew Consultants - Structural Report
Upchurch Associates, the architects engaged by the Developers at the time, invited Matthew Consultants to review their proposals for the extension of the buildings at Chiswick Village prior to formal submission to the local planning authority. This report provides initial structural proposals to support the development plans.
2011
9th August 2011 - CVRL AGM Review letter (see page 2)
2010
December 2010 - CVRL Newsletter – item about the penthouse development